A report from the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine called the "Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide" leads to the conclusion that "there are no experimental data to support the hypothesis that increases in human hydrocarbon use or in atmospheric carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are causing or can be expected to cause unfavorable changes in global temperatures, weather, or landscape. There is no reason to limit human production of CO2, CH4, and other minor greenhouse gases as has been proposed."
Amazing how scientists, without the use of federal money, come to conclusions markedly different from government grant scientists.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment